As a private investigator he could certainly get involved in the movie's central mystery. It's also unclear how much Roger himself may or may not play a role. There are also nods to "Ducktales," "Treasure Planet," "Aladdin," "Indiana Jones" and even "Jurassic Park." So while it is heavily focused on Disney IP, there is at least hope that it could keep the true spirit of "Roger Rabbit" alive and expand to feature some of its competitor's toons as well. Since then, studios have been a lot more stingy with their intellectual property, but there were some signs of hope with appearances including "My Little Pony" and what appears to be "Mighty Mouse" and "Felix the Cat" as a plush. Oscars: Regina Hall, Wanda Sykes and Amy Schumer Officially Announced as Hosts One of the things that made "Roger Rabbit" so special was the cooperation between all these major studios to give us moments like Daffy Duck and Donald Duck in dueling pianos and cameos that truly represented the width and breadth of the history of animation. properties, but this was only a two-minute trailer. It's too early to tell just how "Roger Rabbit" this spiritual successor is going to go, as we didn't see any appearances from major toons owned by other companies like the Looney Tunes or any other major Warner Bros. Everything is just a little off, and it's too much for the chipmunks, too. There's definitely a heavy meta element to the trailer, with the toons traveling around an interacting with different eras of animation, including the creepy "Uncanny Valley," which takes a look at the type of CGI that made us all cringe when "The Polar Express" came out. The disappearance of a former cast-member reunites the gang for high-stakes adventure through this hybrid Los Angeles. In the intervening years, he's settled into a life of relative normalcy as an insurance salesman. A more complete overview can be found here.Sarah Jessica Parker Addresses the Absence of 'The Actress That Played the Role' of Samantha on WWHLĬhip - inspired by Indiana Jones - appears to stay traditional 2-D animation throughout.The result is: This is a spoiler sentence. No memes, image macros, or reaction gifs.Īny comment containing a "spoiler" must be formatted: No arguing about what is obscure enough to be posted: this should be left to the domain of the upvote/downvote and the moderators. Contact the mods if this applies to you.īe nice!: if you post a rudely condescending/attacking/generally dick-ish comment you will be banned with no prior warning. Exceptions may be made for users who have uploaded multiple appropriate items to a non-monetized channel. No "channel spam'': repeatedly linking to a Youtube/etc. Blatant Spamming of new content will result in a ban. This includes upscaled and remastered versions of vintage material. No recently created content: in order to discourage promotion, most content created within the past ~5 years will be removed. No politics or the like, starting arguments or making political comments will result in an instant ban. No promotion/spam allowed: this isn't the place to promote your music video or short film. Please search before posting: nobody enjoys obvious re-posts. The year must only contain 4 digits inside parentheses () using any other format or not including a (year) will result in deletion. Acceptable year labels: (1985) or (1980)s Include the release year in the post title: if not known, an educated guess of the decade will suffice. If you wish to highlight a portion of content in a post please use the YouTube timestamps option while still linking to the full content. Short clips/edits from content are not allowed: we want full and complete content. Links to blogs or review/digest videos/pages are not welcome. This is a content based sub: we want the goods and nothing else will suffice. A relaxed place to share and discuss lesser known media: silent films, vintage exploitation flicks, finely aged TV, PSAs and other oddities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |